<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Ministry of foreign Affairs of Islamic Republic of Iran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>‍Central Asia and The Caucasus Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3766</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>91</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Russia and United Nations Security Council 
with Focus upon Voting Mechanism</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Russia and United Nations Security Council 
with Focus upon Voting Mechanism</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>92</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">22222</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vahid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zolfaghari</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The hypothesis of this paper is that due to impotency of understanding the changing concept of ‘Geopolitics’ in Russian foreign policy and its shifting strategic choice, the doctrine of political realism and economic pragmatism are not capable of analyzing the Russian voting behavior in the SC, rather, the admixture of classic approaches with the doctrine of critical geopolitics will more clarify the Kremlin’s voting behaviors in the SC. Indeed, realistic and utilitarian approaches on one hand and the concept of politics as societal, cultural and discursive action on the other hand will answer the question. </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The hypothesis of this paper is that due to impotency of understanding the changing concept of ‘Geopolitics’ in Russian foreign policy and its shifting strategic choice, the doctrine of political realism and economic pragmatism are not capable of analyzing the Russian voting behavior in the SC, rather, the admixture of classic approaches with the doctrine of critical geopolitics will more clarify the Kremlin’s voting behaviors in the SC. Indeed, realistic and utilitarian approaches on one hand and the concept of politics as societal, cultural and discursive action on the other hand will answer the question. </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security Council</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">veto power</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">foreign policy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Voting Behavior and Russia</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_22222_3d2172418ce305c7d16d4b05597c6a59.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
